Skip to main content

California's Failure to Pass Clean Energy Legislation Is Disappointing, but Hopes Are Still High for Next Year

Monday, Sep 18 2017

Share
By
Sean Gallagher
recurrent

As California’s legislative session came to a close, three bills which would have accelerated the state’s renewable energy development and created the necessary prerequisites for an integrated grid in the West stalled. Opponents to the bills had offered “poison pill” amendments that would have undermined savings for electricity customers and limited the growth of solar and other distributed energy resources.

This year the legislature looked set to build on its long history of renewable energy leadership, but sadly, we’ve lost a great opportunity for now to expand in-state solar production and integrate with the rest of the West.

Senate Bill 100, introduced by the Senate President, Kevin de Leon, would have set a 60 percent renewable portfolio standard for 2030 and a 100 percent carbon free energy goal for 2045. Chris Holden, chairman of the Assembly Utilities & Energy Committee, had sponsored two bills- Assembly Bills 813 and 726- that would have required the Public Utilities Commission to direct the state’s utilities and community energy providers to procure renewable energy to save ratepayers money. None of the bills were brought to a final vote, but they could be taken up in the legislature next year.

Our national labs have shown that 50 percent of California’s energy can reliably and cost-effectively be provided from solar produced by utility-scale projects and those on the rooftops of homes, businesses, schools, and other buildings. But to get from 13 percent solar generation today to half in the future, we must make our grid more flexible. Better integrating California’s grid with our western neighbors is one key strategy to increase flexibility, one that will require legislation such as that proposed by Chairman Holden to change how the California ISO is governed so that utilities outside California can join.

Adding more large solar projects and creating a west-wide grid should not come at the cost of depriving Californians of the benefits of rooftop solar, battery storage and other distributed energy resources. In a late surprise, PG&E’s electrical workers proposed an amendment which would have effectively prohibited cheaper clean energy alternatives to traditional utility distribution infrastructure. Unionized labor has built all of the large solar projects in California, and Chairman Holden’s procurement bills would have created more work for labor.

We look forward to working with the legislature and the Governor to revive these legislative measures next year and keep California as a leader in forward-looking U.S. energy policy.

Article Type

Tags

Related News

Thursday, Jun 06, 2024

American Solar Panel Manufacturing Capacity Increases 71% in Q1 2024 as Industry Reaches 200-Gigawatt Milestone

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A record-setting 11 gigawatts (GW) of new solar module manufacturing capacity came online in the United States during Q1 2024, the largest quarter of solar manufacturing growth in American history. According to the U.S. Solar Market Insight Q2 2024 report released today by the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and Wood Mackenzie, total U.S. solar module manufacturing capacity now exceeds 26 GW annually.

Read More
Thursday, May 30, 2024

CPUC Continues Anti-Distributed Solar Crusade with Devastating Community Solar Decision

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Today the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) voted to approve its proposed decision that crushes any chance of a scalable community solar program succeeding in California. Following is a statement from Stephanie Doyle, California State Affairs Director for the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA): 

Read More
Thursday, May 09, 2024

Solar and Storage Industry Statement on New Fixed Charges on California Electric Bills

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Today the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) finalized rules requiring California residents to pay new monthly fixed charges on their electricity bills. Households that qualify for the California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE) and Family Electric Rate Assistance (FERA) programs will see $6 and $12 monthly charges, respectively, while all other customers will pay $24.15 monthly.

Read More